CVE-2026-48576
High · 7.9CVSS
7.9
EPSS
2.3%
Published
Jun 9, 2026
CISA due date
—
Cloudanix analysis
A person who already has powerful access to a Windows computer may be able to weaken its startup protections, making tampering harder to detect.
- Exploitation
- Local Privilege
- Attacker needs
- High Privilege
- Complexity
- Moderate
- Impact
- Full Compromise
- Component
- Firmware
- Class
- Authorization Bypass
- Remediation
- Patch
- Effort
- Low
- Patch risk
- Low
What it actually does
This is a local Windows Secure Boot protection-mechanism failure. An attacker who already has high local privileges can bypass the Secure Boot trust boundary and potentially cause unauthorized boot-time code or modified boot components to be accepted. Technically, this undermines the pre-OS chain of trust that is intended to prevent unsigned or untrusted bootloaders, firmware-level components, or early-boot malware from loading before Windows security controls are active. The CVSS scope change and high confidentiality/integrity impact indicate that a successful bypass can affect security boundaries beyond the immediate local process context, although the vulnerability does not directly provide remote code execution or availability impact by itself.
Why it matters to the business
The main business risk is loss of trust in affected Windows endpoints and servers if an attacker who already has administrator-level access uses the flaw to weaken Secure Boot protections, deploy stealthy persistence, or hide tampering from normal operating-system controls. This can increase the cost and complexity of incident response because compromise may occur before endpoint detection tools load. The issue affects many supported Windows desktop and server versions, including Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, so organizations with broad Microsoft estates should treat patch coverage as operationally important even though the vulnerability is not currently in CISA KEV, is not known to be used in ransomware campaigns, has low EPSS probability, and has no public exploit maturity reported.
How an attack unfolds
An attacker must first obtain authorized local access with high privileges, such as administrator-level control, physical access with sufficient rights, or a prior compromise that grants equivalent permissions. The attacker then targets the Secure Boot trust chain by abusing the protection failure to bypass validation that should prevent untrusted boot components or configurations from being accepted. If successful, they can alter boot behavior, introduce malicious or downgraded boot components, or prepare a bootkit-style persistence mechanism that executes before Windows fully initializes. After reboot, the attacker-controlled code may run earlier than operating-system security controls, allowing stealthier persistence, tampering with integrity checks, credential-access preparation, or concealment from standard EDR telemetry. Because no exploitation in the wild or public exploit maturity is reported, defenders should prioritize patching and hardening while using forensic review for systems with suspicious boot configuration changes or prior administrator compromise.
How to fix it
Apply the relevant Microsoft security updates for all affected Windows versions: Windows 10 1607, 1809, 21H2, and 22H2; Windows 11 23H2, 24H2, 25H2, and 26H1; and Windows Server 2012, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025. No exact fixed build numbers were provided in the input, so use the latest cumulative update or security-only update applicable to each operating-system release from Microsoft. Ensure Secure Boot remains enabled after patching, and review UEFI/firmware settings on critical systems. Where patching is delayed, restrict local administrator access, enforce credential hygiene for privileged accounts, prevent unauthorized physical access, monitor and alert on boot-configuration changes, and use device-management controls that prevent users or administrators from disabling Secure Boot without approval. For high-assurance systems, consider attestation-based controls such as measured boot, BitLocker with TPM protection, and endpoint health attestation to detect unexpected boot-chain changes.
How to confirm the fix worked
Confirm that each affected Windows system has installed the relevant Microsoft security update level after the June 2026 publication date and has rebooted successfully. Validate that Secure Boot is enabled using trusted administrative tooling such as System Information, PowerShell Secure Boot checks, firmware/UEFI configuration review, or endpoint-management inventory. Compare OS build and cumulative update levels against Microsoft’s official release notes for the applicable Windows version. Review boot configuration for unexpected changes, including test signing, integrity-check bypasses, custom boot managers, unusual recovery settings, or modified EFI boot entries. For servers and sensitive endpoints, perform a measured-boot or attestation review where available, and verify that BitLocker recovery events or Secure Boot state changes did not occur unexpectedly around the patching window.
Typical attack path
- Gain local high-privilege access to an affected Windows workstation or server.
- Verify that the system uses Secure Boot and is running a vulnerable Windows version.
- Abuse the Secure Boot protection-mechanism failure to bypass expected boot-chain validation.
- Modify boot configuration, boot components, or trust settings to allow untrusted or attacker-controlled early-boot code.
- Reboot the system so the modified boot path is exercised before normal Windows security controls are active.
- Use the early-boot foothold for stealthy persistence, integrity-control bypass, or concealment of follow-on activity.
How to detect it
There are no public, CVE-specific exploitation indicators provided, so detection should focus on evidence of Secure Boot tampering, boot-chain modification, or suspicious administrative activity before reboot. Review Windows Event Logs, especially System, Security, Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Boot, Microsoft-Windows-CodeIntegrity, Microsoft-Windows-SecureBoot-Update, BitLocker, and device-management logs. Look for Secure Boot being disabled, changes to boot configuration data, test-signing or integrity-check bypass settings, unexpected EFI System Partition mounts, altered boot manager files, BitLocker recovery prompts, unusual firmware or UEFI setting changes, and administrative command execution involving boot configuration tools. In EDR telemetry, search for suspicious command lines using bcdedit, bootcfg, bootsect, reagentc, mountvol, diskpart, powershell SecureBoot cmdlets, or vendor firmware utilities. On suspected systems, compare EFI System Partition contents and timestamps against known-good baselines, validate boot manager signatures, check BCD configuration, and review whether changes occurred shortly before a reboot. Because boot-level persistence may evade normal runtime controls, combine host telemetry with secure boot attestation, firmware configuration audit, and offline forensic inspection for high-risk cases.
- bcdedit /set testsigning on
- bcdedit /set nointegritychecks on
- bcdedit /set loadoptions DISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS
- bcdedit /set {bootmgr}
- bcdedit /set {default} recoveryenabled no
- bcdedit /enum firmware
- bcdedit /copy {bootmgr}
- reagentc /disable
- mountvol /s
- mountvol S: /s
- bootsect /nt60
- Set-SecureBootUEFI
- Confirm-SecureBootUEFI
- Secure Boot is disabled
- SecureBoot-Update
- Microsoft-Windows-SecureBoot-Update
- Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Boot
- Microsoft-Windows-CodeIntegrity
- \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
- \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi
- \Boot\BCD
- \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\BCD
- nointegritychecks
- testsigning
- DISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS
What your security team should do
- Inventory affected Windows desktop and server versions and prioritize patch deployment to privileged administrator workstations, domain controllers, virtualization hosts, security tooling servers, and internet-facing administrative jump systems.
- Deploy the latest applicable Microsoft cumulative or security updates and require a reboot to complete remediation.
- Confirm Secure Boot is enabled and protected by firmware configuration controls on systems where the hardware supports it.
- Alert on changes to boot configuration, Secure Boot state, EFI boot entries, BitLocker recovery triggers, and use of tools such as bcdedit, reagentc, mountvol, bootsect, and firmware/UEFI management utilities.
- Harden privileged access because exploitation requires high local privileges; reduce standing local admin rights and enforce MFA and just-in-time access for administrative workflows.
- For systems with prior administrator compromise or unexplained Secure Boot changes, perform deeper forensic review rather than assuming operating-system-level scans are sufficient.
- Track Microsoft guidance for any follow-up Secure Boot, DBX, boot manager, or firmware-related updates that may be required beyond normal cumulative patching.
The record
Protection mechanism failure in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Affected packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Introduced | Fixed |
|---|