CVE-2026-48573
High · 7.9CVSS
7.9
EPSS
2.3%
Published
Jun 9, 2026
CISA due date
—
Cloudanix analysis
A person who already has powerful access to a Windows device may be able to weaken its startup protections and make a compromise harder to remove.
- Exploitation
- Local Privilege
- Attacker needs
- High Privilege
- Complexity
- Moderate
- Impact
- Full Compromise
- Component
- Firmware
- Class
- Authorization Bypass
- Remediation
- Patch
- Effort
- Low
- Patch risk
- Low
What it actually does
This vulnerability is a Windows Secure Boot protection mechanism failure that allows a local attacker with high privileges to bypass a security feature during the boot trust process. Technically, the flaw undermines Secure Boot’s role in ensuring that only trusted boot components are loaded before Windows starts. Successful exploitation can allow an already authorized local attacker to load untrusted or tampered boot components, weaken early-boot integrity guarantees, and potentially establish persistence that operates before normal operating-system security controls are fully active. The CVSS scope change and high confidentiality/integrity impact indicate that compromise may extend beyond the originally authorized security context, though exploitation requires local access and high privileges.
Why it matters to the business
An attacker who already has significant local control of a Windows system could use this flaw to defeat boot-time protections and make a compromise harder to remove or detect. The primary business risk is long-lived persistence on endpoints or servers, reduced trust in device integrity, and the possibility that security tools, disk encryption assumptions, or operating-system protections are bypassed before Windows fully loads. This is most concerning for high-value workstations, administrator machines, domain infrastructure, virtualization hosts, and servers that rely on Secure Boot as part of their trust model. The issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV, has low EPSS, and has no known public exploit maturity in the provided data, so broad opportunistic exploitation is less likely at this time; however, the impact is serious where an attacker has already obtained local administrative-level access.
How an attack unfolds
An attacker first needs local access to an affected Windows system and must already hold high privileges, such as administrative or equivalent authorization. From that position, the attacker targets the Secure Boot trust chain or boot configuration rather than a remotely exposed service. The attacker attempts to use the protection failure to cause Windows to accept or execute boot components that should normally be rejected, or to otherwise bypass Secure Boot’s enforcement of trusted startup code. After modifying boot-related files or configuration, the attacker typically reboots the system so the altered boot path is used. If successful, the system starts with weakened boot integrity guarantees, allowing the attacker to preserve control, hide activity below normal OS-level defenses, or prepare follow-on actions such as loading unauthorized early-boot components. Because this class of attack depends on local privileged access and boot-chain modification, evidence is most likely to appear in endpoint telemetry, firmware or Secure Boot state changes, EFI System Partition activity, BCD changes, and suspicious reboots rather than in perimeter network logs.
How to fix it
Apply the latest Microsoft security updates and cumulative updates for all affected Windows versions, including Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through Windows Server 2025 families listed as affected. Because no exact fixed build numbers were provided, use Microsoft’s official security update guidance for CVE-2026-48573 and verify that each device is on a patched servicing baseline. Where Microsoft provides Secure Boot DB/DBX, boot manager, or revocation updates as part of the remediation, deploy them according to Microsoft’s phased guidance to avoid boot disruption. Keep Secure Boot enabled, protect firmware settings with strong administrative controls, and ensure BitLocker or equivalent disk encryption recovery processes are prepared before changing boot trust settings. For systems that cannot be patched immediately, reduce risk by limiting local administrator access, monitoring and restricting writes to the EFI System Partition, blocking unauthorized boot configuration changes, enforcing EDR tamper protection, and prioritizing high-value servers and administrator workstations.
How to confirm the fix worked
Confirm that affected Windows systems have installed the relevant Microsoft security update or a later cumulative update that addresses the vulnerability. Validate OS build and patch level using centralized patch management, Windows Update compliance reporting, or commands such as winver, systeminfo, Get-HotFix, and DISM package inventory. Confirm that Secure Boot remains enabled after remediation using Windows Security, msinfo32, Confirm-SecureBootUEFI, or firmware management tooling. Review boot configuration with bcdedit /enum all and compare against a known-good baseline. Verify that EFI System Partition files, especially Microsoft boot manager and BCD files, match trusted versions and expected signatures. For critical systems, perform a controlled reboot after patching to ensure the device still boots normally and that Secure Boot enforcement remains active.
Typical attack path
- Gain local access to an affected Windows endpoint or server.
- Obtain high privileges, such as local administrator or equivalent rights.
- Inspect Secure Boot, BitLocker, firmware, and boot configuration state to determine whether the device is a viable target.
- Modify boot-chain components, EFI System Partition contents, or boot configuration data in a way that attempts to bypass Secure Boot enforcement.
- Trigger or wait for a reboot so the modified boot path is executed.
- Use the bypassed boot trust state to maintain persistence, hide tampering, or load untrusted early-boot components.
- Attempt to remove traces by reverting timestamps, clearing logs, or restoring visible configuration values after persistence is established.
How to detect it
To determine whether this vulnerability may already have been exploited, focus on endpoint and boot-chain evidence rather than network indicators. Review Windows Event Logs, EDR telemetry, Sysmon logs, PowerShell logs, firmware/Secure Boot management logs, BitLocker logs, and patch-management records. Look for privileged users or processes modifying boot configuration data, mounting or writing to the EFI System Partition, changing Secure Boot state, adding unusual boot loaders, or rebooting shortly after boot-related commands. Investigate execution of bcdedit.exe, bcdboot.exe, bootsect.exe, mountvol.exe, diskpart.exe, reagentc.exe, powershell.exe, or cmd.exe with arguments referencing boot settings, EFI partitions, nointegritychecks, testsigning, bootdebug, safeboot, or bootmgr. Compare EFI System Partition contents against a known-good baseline, including file hashes, signatures, timestamps, and unexpected additions under EFI\Microsoft\Boot or EFI\Boot. Review Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Boot, Microsoft-Windows-CodeIntegrity, Microsoft-Windows-BitLocker-API, Security, System, and PowerShell Operational logs around suspicious reboots. Treat log clearing, EDR tamper events, unexpected BitLocker recovery prompts, or Secure Boot becoming disabled as high-signal follow-up indicators. There are no universally reliable public exploit-specific indicators in the provided data, so detection should be behavior-based and baseline-driven.
- bcdedit.exe /set
- bcdedit.exe /enum all
- bcdedit.exe /set testsigning on
- bcdedit.exe /set nointegritychecks on
- bcdedit.exe /set bootdebug on
- bcdedit.exe /set {bootmgr}
- bcdboot.exe
- bootsect.exe
- mountvol.exe /s
- diskpart.exe
- reagentc.exe /disable
- reagentc.exe /enable
- \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
- \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\BCD
- \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi
- C:\Windows\Boot\EFI\bootmgfw.efi
- HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecureBoot\State
- UEFISecureBootEnabled
- Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Boot
- Microsoft-Windows-CodeIntegrity
- Microsoft-Windows-BitLocker-API
- Microsoft-Windows-PowerShell/Operational
- wevtutil cl
- Clear-EventLog
What your security team should do
- Prioritize patching high-value Windows systems, including administrator workstations, domain controllers, virtualization hosts, security management servers, and internet-facing Windows servers even though exploitation requires local high privileges.
- Inventory all affected Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server versions and verify they are receiving current cumulative security updates.
- Reduce standing local administrator privileges and enforce just-in-time or just-enough administration to limit the precondition needed for exploitation.
- Monitor for boot configuration changes, EFI System Partition writes, Secure Boot state changes, BitLocker recovery events, and suspicious reboots following privileged activity.
- Enable or tune EDR detections for bcdedit.exe, bcdboot.exe, mountvol.exe, diskpart.exe, powershell.exe, and cmd.exe activity that modifies boot settings or accesses the EFI System Partition.
- Protect firmware and Secure Boot settings with strong administrative controls, disable unauthorized external boot paths where feasible, and maintain asset-level firmware configuration baselines.
- For sensitive systems, consider post-remediation integrity checks of EFI boot files and BCD configuration against a known-good image.
- Prepare recovery procedures before deploying Secure Boot revocation or boot-chain updates, especially on legacy servers or systems with custom boot configurations.
The record
Protection mechanism failure in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Affected packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Introduced | Fixed |
|---|