CVE-2026-64374
High · 7.5CVSS
7.5
EPSS
0.4%
Published
Jul 25, 2026
CISA due date
—
Cloudanix analysis
A Linux scheduling bug can cause busy systems to freeze or become severely unresponsive under certain heavy network and real-time workload conditions.
- Exploitation
- Remote Unauthenticated
- Attacker needs
- None
- Complexity
- Moderate
- Impact
- Denial Of Service
- Component
- OS kernel
- Class
- Denial of service
- Remediation
- Upgrade
- Effort
- Medium
- Patch risk
- Low
What it actually does
This Linux kernel scheduler flaw can cause a CPU livelock on non-PREEMPT_RT kernels when real-time task migration uses RT_PUSH_IPI under heavy softirq activity, such as high network interrupt load. The affected CPU can be repeatedly interrupted by inter-processor interrupts while attempting to schedule queued real-time tasks, preventing it from returning to task context and making forward progress. The practical technical result is denial of service through severe CPU starvation, scheduler stalls, latency spikes, and potential system instability or watchdog-triggered recovery.
Why it matters to the business
Successful exploitation or accidental triggering can degrade or interrupt availability of Linux systems, especially large multi-CPU hosts handling heavy network traffic and real-time workloads. Business consequences may include service outages, missed real-time processing deadlines, packet loss, application timeouts, degraded customer-facing services, and emergency reboots. Although the current EPSS is low and there is no known CISA KEV listing or mature public exploit indicated, kernel availability bugs should be prioritized for systems running latency-sensitive, network-heavy, or real-time workloads.
How an attack unfolds
An attacker or workload does not gain code execution or data access through this flaw; the impact is availability. Exploitation involves creating conditions where a non-PREEMPT_RT Linux kernel is under heavy softirq activity, commonly from high-volume networking, while real-time tasks are repeatedly awakened and queued. Other CPUs observe an overloaded runqueue and send RT_PUSH_IPI requests to the CPU that should schedule those real-time tasks. Because softirqs are executing in interrupt context on non-PREEMPT_RT kernels, the CPU may be unable to complete the scheduling transition. Repeated IPIs further slow softirq completion, creating a livelock where the CPU remains overloaded and does not make normal forward progress. In a real attack, remote traffic may contribute to the necessary network softirq pressure, but reliable exploitation generally depends on the victim system’s kernel configuration, CPU topology, scheduler behavior, workload, and presence of real-time tasks.
How to fix it
Apply a vendor kernel update that includes the upstream fix making RT_PUSH_IPI default off for non-PREEMPT_RT kernels. Because no specific affected package list or fixed versions were provided, use the fixed kernel versions published by the relevant Linux distribution or appliance vendor and prioritize production systems with high network throughput, large CPU counts, or real-time workloads. If immediate patching is not possible, reduce exposure by limiting untrusted high-volume network traffic, applying rate limits, isolating real-time workloads from internet-facing traffic paths, reducing avoidable RT task wakeups, and monitoring for softirq/IPI saturation. Kernel configuration or runtime mitigation options may vary by distribution; follow vendor guidance rather than manually changing scheduler internals unless validated in a test environment.
How to confirm the fix worked
Confirm that systems are running a kernel build containing the scheduler fix for RT_PUSH_IPI behavior on non-PREEMPT_RT kernels. Validate by checking the installed kernel package against vendor advisories, rebooting into the corrected kernel, and confirming the running kernel version with standard OS inventory tooling. For high-risk platforms, run a controlled regression test that combines expected production network load with real-time task activity and verify that CPU livelock, excessive scheduler latency, watchdog warnings, and abnormal IPI growth do not occur. Also confirm that monitoring shows normal softirq processing, stable CPU utilization, and no recurring kernel scheduler or RCU stall messages after remediation.
Typical attack path
- Identify or target a Linux system running an affected non-PREEMPT_RT kernel with many CPUs and real-time or latency-sensitive workloads.
- Generate heavy network activity or otherwise induce sustained softirq processing on one or more CPUs.
- Cause or wait for repeated wakeups of real-time tasks so the scheduler marks CPUs as having queued higher-priority RT work.
- Trigger RT migration behavior where other CPUs repeatedly send inter-processor interrupts to overloaded CPUs.
- Sustain the workload until softirq processing and repeated IPIs prevent the target CPU from returning to task context.
- Observe denial-of-service effects such as CPU livelock, latency spikes, soft lockup warnings, packet loss, application hangs, or system instability.
How to detect it
This issue is a denial-of-service condition and does not inherently create files, accounts, persistence, or command-execution artifacts. Detection should focus on signs that a host experienced scheduler livelock or severe kernel availability degradation. Review kernel logs, system journals, hypervisor console logs, crash dumps, performance telemetry, and network monitoring around outage windows. Look for soft lockup, hard lockup, RCU stall, hung task, watchdog, excessive interrupt, and ksoftirqd saturation messages. Compare /proc/interrupts, CPU utilization, softirq counters, packet rates, and real-time task activity during the incident if historical telemetry is available. Network telemetry may show unusually high packet rates preceding the outage, but traffic alone is not a reliable indicator because the bug depends on kernel configuration and workload conditions. There are no known threat actors or public exploitation campaigns reported in the provided data.
- watchdog: BUG: soft lockup
- NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP
- rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
- rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
- INFO: task
- blocked for more than
- softirq
- ksoftirqd
- NET_RX
- NET_TX
- IPI
- rescheduling interrupts
- smp_call_function
- sched/rt
- rt_push
- RT_PUSH_IPI
What your security team should do
- Inventory Linux systems running real-time workloads, high-throughput networking, or large CPU counts, and prioritize them for kernel update validation.
- Track vendor kernel advisories for this issue and deploy the fixed kernel as soon as it is available for each supported distribution or appliance.
- Prioritize patching for externally reachable systems where remote traffic could contribute to high softirq pressure.
- Add monitoring for kernel soft lockups, RCU stalls, abnormal IPI rates, ksoftirqd saturation, and unexplained service latency spikes.
- If patching is delayed, apply network rate limiting, traffic filtering, or workload isolation to reduce the chance of sustained softirq overload.
- After patching, reboot into the fixed kernel and verify the active kernel version rather than only confirming package installation.
- Review incident data for recent unexplained CPU stalls or watchdog events on network-heavy Linux hosts, while recognizing that this vulnerability does not produce strong file-based indicators.
The record
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/rt: Have RT_PUSH_IPI be default off for non PREEMPT_RT RT migration is done aggressively. When a CPU schedules out a high priority RT task for a lower priority task, it will look to see if there's any RT tasks that are waiting to run on another CPU that is of higher priority than the task this CPU is about to run. If it finds one, it will pull that task over to the CPU and allow it to run there instead. Normally, this pulling is done by looking at the RT overloaded mask (rto) which contains all the CPUs in the scheduler domain with RT tasks that are waiting to run due to a higher priority RT task currently running on their CPU. The CPU that is about to schedule a lower priority task will grab the rq lock of the overloaded CPU and move the RT task from that CPU's runqueue to the local one and schedule the higher priority RT task. This caused issues when a lot of CPUs would schedule a lower priority task at the same time. They would all try to grab the same runqueue lock of the CPU with the overloaded RT tasks. Only the first CPU that got in will get that task. All the others would wait until they got the runqueue lock and see there's nothing to pull and do nothing. On systems with lots of CPUs, this caused a large latency (up to 500us) which is beyond what PREEMPT_RT is to allow. The solution to that was to create an RT_PUSH_IPI logic. When any CPU wanted to pull a task, instead of grabbing the runqueue lock of the overloaded CPU, it would start by sending an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and that IPI handler would have the CPU with the waiting RT task do a push instead. Then that handler would send an IPI to the next CPU with overloaded RT tasks, and so on. Note, after the first CPU starts this process, if another CPU wanted to do a pull, it would see that the process has already begun and would only increment a counter to have the IPIs continue again. The RT_PUSH_IPI solved the latency problem with PREEMPT_RT but could cause a new issue with non PREEMPT_RT. Namely, softirqs run in a threaded context on PREEMPT_RT but they can run in an interrupt context in non-RT. If an IPI lands on a CPU that has just woken up multiple RT tasks and the current CPU is running a non RT or a low priority RT task, instead of doing a push, it would simply do a schedule on that CPU. But if a softirq was also executing on this CPU, the schedule would need to wait until the softirq finished. Until then, the CPU would still be considered overloaded as there are RT tasks still waiting to run on it. A live lock occurred on a workload that was doing heavy networking traffic on a large machine where the softirqs would run 500us out of 750us. And it would also be waking up RT tasks, causing the RT pull logic to be constantly executed. When a softirq triggered on a CPU with RT tasks queued but not running yet, and the other CPUs would see this CPU as being overloaded, they would send an IPI over to it. The CPU would notice that the waiting RT tasks are of higher priority than the currently running task and simply schedule that CPU instead. But because the softirq was executing, before it could schedule, it would receive another IPI to do the same. The amount of IPIs would slow down the currently running softirq so much that before it could return back to task context, it would execute another softirq never allowing the CPU to schedule. This live locked that CPU. As RT_PUSH_IPI was created to help PREEMPT_RT, make it default off if PREEMPT_RT is not enabled.
Affected packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Introduced | Fixed |
|---|