CVE-2026-50720
Medium · 6.4CVSS
6.4
EPSS
0.1%
Published
Aug 19, 2026
CISA due date
—
The record
The Ingenic T31 SoC boot ROM flash-boot verification path compares only a single 32-bit word of the RSA signature output against a single 32-bit word of the SHA-256 payload digest, rather than compare the full data. This allows an attacker with physical write access to boot media to forge modified SPL (Secondary Program Loader) images that pass secure boot verification without possession of the OEM signing key. Each forgery attempt succeeds with approximately 2/3 probability. This has been validated via reverse engineering, software emulation against vendor-signed images, and end-to-end hardware acceptance of a forged firmware image on a Wyze Video Doorbell v2 (T31X).
Affected packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Introduced | Fixed |
|---|
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-87947 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO… CWE-347
- CVE-2026-84918 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Drupal Monobank payment… CWE-347
- CVE-2026-102271 PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. CWE-347
- CVE-2026-102272 PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. CWE-347
- CVE-2026-102273 PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. CWE-347
- CVE-2026-102268 PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. CWE-347
- CVE-2026-102266 PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. CWE-347
- CVE-2026-73784 A potential security vulnerability in HPE IceWall products could be exploited to tamper… CWE-347