Cloudanix VulnDB

CVE-2026-50508

Medium · 6.5

CVSS

6.5

EPSS

0.9%

Published

Jun 9, 2026

CISA due date

—

Cloudanix analysis

Next patch cycle SSVC: Track

A Windows authentication weakness could let attackers trick people into exposing login information that may be used to impersonate them on the network.

Chainable
Exploitation
Requires User Interaction
Attacker needs
User Interaction
Complexity
Moderate
Impact
Data Exposure
Component
OS kernel
Class
Information Disclosure
Remediation
Upgrade
Effort
Medium
Patch risk
Low

What it actually does

The flaw exposes sensitive NTLM authentication material to an unauthorized network actor when a user or system is induced to authenticate to attacker-controlled infrastructure. Because exploitation requires user interaction but no prior privileges, an attacker can potentially capture NTLM challenge/response data or abuse NTLM authentication behavior for spoofing or relay-style attacks. The primary technical consequence is confidentiality loss of authentication material rather than direct code execution, data modification, or service disruption.

Why it matters to the business

Successful exploitation can let an attacker impersonate users or systems on the network, enabling unauthorized access to internal services that accept NTLM authentication. This can lead to account compromise, lateral movement, exposure of sensitive data, and follow-on attacks against file shares, web applications, email, or administrative interfaces. The CVSS score indicates moderate severity, but the network attack vector, low attack complexity, and high confidentiality impact make it important to address, especially in environments that still permit NTLM broadly.

How an attack unfolds

An attacker first positions a lure or network resource that causes a Windows user or service to initiate NTLM authentication to an attacker-controlled endpoint. This may be done through a malicious link, embedded external resource, document, UNC path, email content, or other mechanism that triggers outbound authentication. When the victim system attempts to authenticate, NTLM challenge/response material is exposed to the attacker. Depending on configuration, the attacker may capture the material for offline cracking or relay the authentication to another service that accepts NTLM, allowing spoofed access as the victim without knowing the plaintext password. Exploitation is more practical where outbound NTLM is unrestricted, SMB or LDAP signing is not enforced, Extended Protection for Authentication is absent, and high-value users can be induced to interact with attacker-controlled content.

How to fix it

Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-50508 as soon as it is available for all supported Windows versions in use. Because no specific fixed product versions were provided, use Microsoft Security Update Guide and enterprise patch management tooling to identify applicable cumulative updates. Reduce exposure by disabling NTLM where feasible, restricting outbound NTLM to untrusted destinations, enforcing SMB signing and LDAP signing/channel binding, enabling Extended Protection for Authentication on supported services, and preferring Kerberos over NTLM. Block outbound SMB to the internet at network egress points. Harden email, browser, and document-handling controls to prevent automatic authentication to external resources. Monitor and restrict use of privileged accounts from workstations where users process email or web content.

How to confirm the fix worked

Confirm that all affected Windows systems report installation of the applicable cumulative security update that includes the fix. Validate that NTLM restrictions are configured through Group Policy or equivalent controls, including auditing or blocking outbound NTLM where appropriate. Test that external UNC paths and remote resources do not cause automatic NTLM authentication to untrusted hosts. Verify SMB signing, LDAP signing, LDAP channel binding, and Extended Protection for Authentication are enabled on relevant services. Review domain controller, endpoint, proxy, firewall, and Windows NTLM operational logs to confirm there are no unexpected NTLM authentications to external or untrusted destinations after remediation.

Typical attack path

  1. Identify an organization or service environment where NTLM authentication is likely enabled or accepted.
  2. Prepare an attacker-controlled SMB, HTTP, LDAP, or similar endpoint capable of receiving or relaying NTLM authentication.
  3. Deliver a lure that causes a user or system to access a remote resource, such as a UNC path, embedded object, link, or document reference.
  4. Capture the victim's NTLM challenge/response exchange or relay it in real time to a target service that accepts NTLM.
  5. Attempt offline password cracking, authentication relay, or impersonation against internal services.
  6. Use obtained or relayed access to read sensitive data, enumerate network resources, or move laterally.

How to detect it

Investigate historical evidence of coerced or suspicious NTLM authentication. Collect Windows Security logs from endpoints and servers, domain controller authentication logs, Microsoft-Windows-NTLM/Operational logs, SMB client/server logs, proxy logs, DNS logs, firewall or network flow records, and EDR telemetry. Look for NTLM authentication attempts to external IP addresses, newly observed hosts, unusual SMB or HTTP destinations, or systems that normally should use Kerberos. On domain controllers, review NTLM validation events and failed authentication bursts. On endpoints, correlate user interaction events with outbound connections to ports commonly used for NTLM capture or relay, such as TCP 445, 139, 80, 443, 389, 636, and 5985. Hunt for signs of NTLM relay tooling behavior, including unexpected inbound SMB/HTTP listeners, suspicious Python or Go-based network tools, and authentication attempts followed quickly by access to file shares, LDAP, AD CS, or administrative services. Pay particular attention to high-value users, privileged workstations, and authentication events where the workstation name, source address, or target service is inconsistent with normal activity.

  • Microsoft-Windows-NTLM/Operational
  • Event ID 8001
  • Event ID 8002
  • Event ID 8003
  • Event ID 8004
  • Authentication Package: NTLM
  • Logon Process: NtLmSsp
  • Package Name (NTLM only): NTLM V1
  • LmPackageName: NTLM V1
  • Event ID 4776
  • Event ID 4624
  • Event ID 4625
  • ANONYMOUS LOGON
  • NTLM authentication to remote servers is blocked
  • Audit NTLM authentication to remote servers
  • Outbound NTLM traffic to remote servers
  • \\@
  • file://
  • smb://
  • TCP/445 outbound
  • TCP/139 outbound
  • ntlmrelayx.py
  • Responder.py
  • responder.conf
  • Inveigh.exe
  • Inveigh.ps1
  • Impacket

What your security team should do

  • Prioritize deployment of the Microsoft security update across Windows endpoints and servers once applicable patches are available.
  • Inventory where NTLM is still enabled, accepted, or required, and create a phased plan to reduce or eliminate NTLM dependency.
  • Block outbound SMB and related Windows authentication traffic to the internet at firewalls, proxies, and endpoint controls.
  • Enable NTLM auditing before enforcement, then restrict or deny outbound NTLM to remote servers where business impact is understood.
  • Enforce SMB signing, LDAP signing, LDAP channel binding, and Extended Protection for Authentication to reduce relay viability.
  • Increase monitoring for unusual NTLM authentication, especially from workstations to external IP addresses or unexpected internal servers.
  • Review privileged account workflows and prevent administrative accounts from being used for email, browsing, or document-opening activity.
  • Educate users about links, documents, and file paths that may trigger authentication to attacker-controlled resources.

The record

Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Affected packages

Ecosystem Package Introduced Fixed

Related vulnerabilities