Cloudanix VulnDB

CVE-2026-49783

High · 7.8

CVSS

7.8

EPSS

0.3%

Published

Jul 14, 2026

CISA due date

—

Cloudanix analysis

Next patch cycle SSVC: Track

A person who already has access to a Windows device may be able to weaken a startup protection feature and hide deeper control of the system.

Exploitation
Local Privilege
Attacker needs
Low Privilege
Complexity
Moderate
Impact
Full Compromise
Component
Firmware
Class
Authorization Bypass
Remediation
Patch
Effort
Low
Patch risk
Low

What it actually does

CVE-2026-49783 is a local Windows Secure Boot security feature bypass caused by an improperly implemented security check. An attacker who already has authorized local access can bypass Secure Boot trust enforcement and potentially load untrusted or tampered boot components before the operating system fully starts. Because Secure Boot is intended to prevent unauthorized bootloaders, bootkits, and pre-OS tampering, successful exploitation can undermine operating system integrity protections and enable stealthy persistence that is difficult to detect from within the running OS. The CVSS vector indicates local access, low attack complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Why it matters to the business

This vulnerability can allow an attacker who has already gained local access to weaken a core platform trust control on affected Windows workstations and servers. In practical terms, it can turn an initial foothold into deeper persistence, stealth, and control, potentially allowing credential theft, tampering with security tools, and long-term compromise that survives reboots. It affects many supported Windows desktop and server versions, including Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025, so exposure may be broad in organizations with mixed Windows fleets. Although it is not currently listed in CISA KEV, has no reported ransomware use, and has low EPSS at this time, Secure Boot bypasses should still be prioritized because they can materially weaken endpoint and server trust guarantees after an attacker obtains local access.

How an attack unfolds

An attacker first needs local authorized access to an affected Windows system, such as through a compromised standard user account, insider access, or post-exploitation access from another vulnerability. The attacker then abuses the flawed Secure Boot security check to bypass the expected validation of boot-related components or configuration. Once the bypass is achieved, the attacker may introduce or enable untrusted boot code, modify boot configuration, or prepare a boot-level persistence mechanism. After reboot, malicious or unauthorized code can execute earlier than the operating system and many endpoint defenses, allowing the attacker to hide activity, interfere with security controls, harvest sensitive information, or maintain persistence. Because the activity occurs around the boot chain and EFI system partition, normal OS-level monitoring may not fully capture the compromise unless firmware, boot configuration, and Secure Boot state are explicitly audited.

How to fix it

Apply the Microsoft security updates that address CVE-2026-49783 across all affected Windows versions, including Windows 10 1607, 1809, 21H2, 22H2; Windows 11 24H2, 25H2, 26H1; and Windows Server 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025. Where exact fixed build numbers are not available from the provided data, use the latest cumulative update and servicing stack update applicable to each Windows release from Microsoft. Ensure Secure Boot remains enabled after patching and that boot configuration has not been weakened. For high-risk systems, also review EFI system partition integrity, BitLocker recovery events, boot configuration settings, and endpoint security telemetry for signs of pre-patch tampering. Mitigations include restricting local administrative access, enforcing least privilege, enabling credential protection features, monitoring changes to boot configuration and EFI files, using BitLocker with TPM-backed protection, and preventing unauthorized physical or console access.

How to confirm the fix worked

Confirm affected systems have installed the Microsoft cumulative/security update released to address this vulnerability or a later superseding update. Validate the installed OS build and patch level using Windows Update, enterprise patch management, PowerShell, or vulnerability scanning. Check that Secure Boot is enabled using PowerShell, for example Confirm-SecureBootUEFI on supported systems, or by reviewing firmware/UEFI settings. Review boot configuration with bcdedit /enum all and verify that unsafe options such as testsigning, nointegritychecks, bootdebug, and debug are not enabled unless explicitly approved. Compare EFI system partition boot files against known-good versions from patched systems or vendor media where feasible. Re-run authenticated vulnerability scans after patch deployment and confirm the CVE is no longer reported.

Typical attack path

  1. Obtain local access to an affected Windows workstation or server using valid credentials, malware, remote access tooling, or prior compromise.
  2. Confirm the system uses a vulnerable Windows version and that Secure Boot-related protections are relevant to the target.
  3. Abuse the improper Secure Boot security check to bypass enforcement of trusted boot standards.
  4. Modify boot configuration, boot files, or EFI system partition contents to enable untrusted or attacker-controlled boot behavior.
  5. Reboot or wait for a reboot so the altered boot path is used.
  6. Establish stealthy persistence or tamper with operating system and security controls from a privileged pre-OS or early-boot position.
  7. Use the persistent access to collect credentials, disable defenses, move laterally, or maintain long-term control.

How to detect it

Detection should focus on evidence of boot-chain tampering, Secure Boot state changes, suspicious boot configuration changes, and attempts to write to the EFI system partition. Review Windows Security logs, System logs, Microsoft-Windows-CodeIntegrity/Operational, Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Boot, Microsoft-Windows-BitLocker/BitLocker Management, Microsoft-Windows-SecureBoot, PowerShell logs, EDR process telemetry, and file integrity monitoring. Look for execution of boot-management tools such as bcdedit.exe, mountvol.exe, diskpart.exe, bootsect.exe, reagentc.exe, or PowerShell commands that mount or modify the EFI system partition. Investigate changes to EFI boot files such as bootmgfw.efi and bootx64.efi, unexpected BCD settings, disabled Secure Boot, BitLocker recovery prompts after boot changes, and new or modified files under EFI boot directories. Because no public exploit maturity is reported and no specific threat actors are provided, there are no reliable CVE-specific malware indicators; detection should use behavioral indicators and compare boot artifacts to known-good baselines.

  • bcdedit.exe /set testsigning on
  • bcdedit.exe /set nointegritychecks on
  • bcdedit.exe /set bootdebug on
  • bcdedit.exe /set debug on
  • testsigning Yes
  • nointegritychecks Yes
  • bootdebug Yes
  • debug Yes
  • \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
  • \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi
  • C:\Windows\Boot\EFI\bootmgfw.efi
  • HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecureBoot\State
  • UEFISecureBootEnabled
  • Confirm-SecureBootUEFI
  • mountvol.exe
  • diskpart.exe
  • bootsect.exe
  • reagentc.exe
  • Microsoft-Windows-CodeIntegrity/Operational
  • Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Boot
  • Microsoft-Windows-BitLocker/BitLocker Management

What your security team should do

  • Prioritize patching internet-facing administration workstations, privileged access workstations, domain controllers, virtualization hosts, security tooling servers, and other high-value Windows systems first.
  • Deploy the latest Microsoft cumulative updates for all affected Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server versions, then verify installation through authenticated scanning.
  • Audit Secure Boot status across the fleet and investigate systems where Secure Boot is unexpectedly disabled or unsupported.
  • Review BCD and EFI system partition changes on high-value systems, especially where local compromise is suspected.
  • Restrict local administrator rights and interactive logon rights to reduce the ability to exploit a local Secure Boot bypass after initial access.
  • Enable or validate BitLocker with TPM protection on applicable endpoints and servers to raise the difficulty of offline or boot-chain tampering.
  • Monitor for suspicious use of bcdedit, mountvol, diskpart, reagentc, bootsect, and direct writes to EFI boot paths.
  • Treat unexplained boot configuration changes, Secure Boot state changes, or early-boot security alerts as high severity, even if no public exploit is currently known.
  • Include Secure Boot and boot-chain integrity checks in incident response playbooks for compromised Windows endpoints and servers.

The record

Improperly implemented security check for standard in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

Affected packages

Ecosystem Package Introduced Fixed

Related vulnerabilities