CVE-2026-48578
High · 7.9CVSS
7.9
EPSS
0.3%
Published
Jun 9, 2026
CISA due date
—
Cloudanix analysis
A person who already has full control of a Windows device could weaken its startup protections, making the device harder to trust and clean after a compromise.
- Exploitation
- Local Privilege
- Attacker needs
- High Privilege
- Complexity
- Moderate
- Impact
- Full Compromise
- Component
- OS kernel
- Class
- Authorization Bypass
- Remediation
- Patch
- Effort
- Low
- Patch risk
- Low
What it actually does
This vulnerability is a local Windows Secure Boot security-feature bypass caused by a protection mechanism failure. An attacker who already has high privileges on an affected Windows system can interfere with the trusted boot chain so that code or boot components that should be blocked by Secure Boot may execute during startup. Because Secure Boot is intended to prevent unauthorized bootloaders, kernel-level tampering, and persistence below the operating system, successful exploitation can undermine platform trust and enable stealthy post-compromise activity. The CVSS vector indicates local access, low attack complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality and integrity impact, with no direct availability impact.
Why it matters to the business
The primary business risk is loss of trust in affected Windows endpoints and servers after an attacker has already obtained administrative control. If exploited, the attacker may be able to establish highly persistent access, evade some endpoint security controls, or weaken assurances around device integrity, creating expensive incident response and reimaging requirements. The issue affects a broad range of Windows client and server versions, including Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2012, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025. Although it is not currently listed in CISA KEV, is not known to be used in ransomware campaigns, has low EPSS, and has no reported exploit maturity, its impact is significant because Secure Boot failures can invalidate core device-trust assumptions.
How an attack unfolds
An attacker first needs to obtain high privileges on a vulnerable Windows system through separate means such as credential theft, exploitation of another vulnerability, malicious insider access, or misuse of administrative tooling. With local administrative control, the attacker targets the Secure Boot trust boundary and attempts to introduce or activate boot components, configuration, or boot-chain behavior that should normally be blocked. After modifying the boot path or related configuration, the attacker reboots the system so the malicious or unauthorized component is evaluated during startup. If the bypass succeeds, the system may boot with compromised trust guarantees, allowing the attacker to maintain stealthier persistence, tamper with the operating system at a low level, or facilitate later data theft and defense evasion. Because exploitation requires prior high privilege, this vulnerability is most relevant as a post-compromise escalation, persistence, and defense-evasion technique rather than an initial access vector.
How to fix it
Apply the relevant Microsoft security updates for the affected Windows versions as soon as they are available through Windows Update, Microsoft Update Catalog, WSUS, Intune, Configuration Manager, or other enterprise patch management systems. Because no exact fixed version was provided, use Microsoft’s official security update guidance for CVE-2026-48578 and confirm that all supported Windows client and server builds receive the June 2026 or later applicable cumulative/security update. Prioritize systems where Secure Boot is enabled and where compromise would have high impact, including privileged access workstations, domain controllers, virtualization hosts, certificate authorities, management servers, and internet-facing Windows servers. Where patching is delayed, reduce risk by restricting local administrator rights, enforcing privileged access management, monitoring and blocking unauthorized boot configuration changes, enabling BitLocker with TPM protection where appropriate, maintaining EDR coverage, and requiring physical and firmware security controls. Systems suspected of exploitation should not be trusted solely because the OS appears healthy; consider offline forensic validation, firmware/boot-chain inspection, credential rotation, and clean rebuild from trusted media.
How to confirm the fix worked
Confirm exposure by inventorying affected Windows versions and verifying whether each system has installed the applicable Microsoft security update released for this issue or a later cumulative update. Validate that Secure Boot remains enabled where required by policy using Windows Security, PowerShell, or firmware management tooling. Review boot configuration for unexpected settings such as test signing, integrity-check bypasses, debug boot options, alternate boot managers, or unusual boot entries. On representative patched systems, confirm boot files are Microsoft-signed and match known-good versions from the installed update baseline. For high-assurance systems, compare EFI System Partition contents against a trusted baseline and verify that endpoint security or configuration-management tools report no unauthorized changes to boot components. If a system shows unexplained Secure Boot state changes, unauthorized BCD changes, or modified EFI boot files, treat it as potentially compromised even if the patch is installed afterward.
Typical attack path
- Gain local high-privilege access to an affected Windows client or server by separate means.
- Enumerate Secure Boot state, boot configuration, firmware mode, and Windows boot components.
- Modify or stage unauthorized boot-chain components or boot configuration that would normally be blocked by Secure Boot protections.
- Reboot the system to cause the altered boot path or component to execute during startup.
- Use the weakened boot trust state to maintain persistence, conceal tampering, or support additional credential theft, data access, or security-control evasion.
How to detect it
Hunt for evidence of post-compromise boot-chain tampering rather than remote exploit traffic, because this is a local high-privilege Secure Boot bypass. Relevant data sources include Windows Security logs, System logs, Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Boot events, Microsoft-Windows-BitLocker/BitLocker Management events, Microsoft-Windows-CodeIntegrity events, PowerShell logs, Sysmon process and file events, EDR telemetry, firmware/UEFI management logs, and configuration-management records. Look for administrative execution of boot-management utilities such as bcdedit.exe, bootcfg.exe, mountvol.exe, diskpart.exe, reagentc.exe, powershell.exe, and cmd.exe followed by changes to BCD settings, mounting of the EFI System Partition, modification of EFI boot files, Secure Boot state changes, unexpected reboot activity, or BitLocker recovery prompts. Review the EFI System Partition for unauthorized or recently modified files under EFI boot paths. Investigate BCD settings that disable or weaken integrity enforcement, including testsigning, nointegritychecks, debug, bootdebug, or alternate boot manager paths. Correlate suspicious boot changes with privileged logons, new local administrator membership, EDR alerts, credential-dumping activity, or other signs of prior compromise. There are no public threat actors, KEV listing, ransomware association, or known exploit maturity provided, so detection should focus on generic boot persistence and Secure Boot tampering behaviors.
- bcdedit.exe /set testsigning on
- bcdedit.exe /set nointegritychecks on
- bcdedit.exe /set debug on
- bcdedit.exe /set bootdebug on
- bcdedit.exe /set {bootmgr} path
- bcdedit.exe /enum firmware
- mountvol.exe /s
- \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
- \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgr.efi
- \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi
- \Boot\BCD
- Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Boot
- Microsoft-Windows-CodeIntegrity
- Microsoft-Windows-BitLocker
- Confirm-SecureBootUEFI
- Set-SecureBootUEFI
- Get-SecureBootUEFI
- reagentc.exe /disable
- diskpart.exe
- bootcfg.exe
What your security team should do
- Prioritize patch deployment for privileged workstations, administrative jump hosts, domain controllers, virtualization infrastructure, security tooling servers, and other high-value Windows assets.
- Inventory all affected Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server versions and map them to patch compliance status for the applicable Microsoft security update or later cumulative update.
- Monitor for changes to Secure Boot state, boot configuration data, EFI System Partition contents, and Windows boot manager files.
- Restrict and audit local administrator access because exploitation requires high privileges before the Secure Boot bypass can be attempted.
- Investigate systems with recent unexplained reboots followed by boot configuration changes, Secure Boot disablement, or modified boot files.
- For suspected exploitation, perform offline triage of boot components, rotate credentials used on the host, and consider rebuilding from trusted media rather than relying on in-place cleanup.
- Ensure BitLocker, TPM protections, EDR, tamper protection, and firmware/UEFI security settings are enabled and centrally monitored where operationally feasible.
- Track Microsoft guidance for any additional Secure Boot database, boot manager, or revocation updates related to this issue.
The record
Protection mechanism failure in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Affected packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Introduced | Fixed |
|---|
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-114574 A security vulnerability has been detected in massCodeIO massCode 5.10. CWE-284
- CVE-2026-83395 Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise… CWE-284
- CVE-2026-112091 A flaw has been found in Dav-ee dairy-management-system… CWE-284
- CVE-2026-106580 ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital… CWE-284
- CVE-2026-61700 MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and… CWE-284
- CVE-2026-86812 The WPCafe WordPress plugin before 3.0.18 does not correctly restrict access to a set of… CWE-284
- CVE-2026-85545 There is an Vulnerability in some HikCentral Access Control versions. CWE-284
- CVE-2026-78084 Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing Access Control in Gallery Image Management in… CWE-284