CVE-2026-113733

The record

An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.3 and 6.0 before 6.0.10. The `django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` function did not obfuscate the password field of user models other than `AUTH_USER_MODEL`, or of an `AUTH_USER_MODEL` inheriting its password field from a concrete parent model through multi-table inheritance, which allows authenticated staff users with only the view permission on such a model to obtain full password hashes via the read-only change form. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Aaron chen for reporting this issue.

Affected packages

Related vulnerabilities

• CVE-2026-89292 In Eclipse Mnestix Browser versions 1.6.0 up until but excluding 2.3.0 it was possible… CWE-522
• CVE-2026-105769 kaniko before 1.25.20 can send a Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) access token for Azure… CWE-522
• CVE-2026-116252 pgAdmin 4's materialized view refresh passed the target database's name to psql's… CWE-522
• CVE-2026-116245 libpq looks a connection service up in the service file of the operating-system account… CWE-522
• CVE-2026-116247 When a server in pgAdmin 4 had no password file, client certificate or client key… CWE-522
• CVE-2026-116244 When a pgAdmin 4 connection was not meant to use a Kerberos user's delegated credentials… CWE-522
• CVE-2026-116242 pgAdmin 4 opens SSH tunnels with the sshtunnel library but gave it neither… CWE-522
• CVE-2026-61730 SOCFortress CoPilot focuses on providing a single pane of glass for all your security… CWE-522