CVE-2023-2533
High · 8.4 CISA KEVCVSS
8.4
EPSS
28.8%
Published
Jun 20, 2023
CISA due date
Aug 18, 2025
Cloudanix analysis
A malicious website or link can trick a logged-in PaperCut administrator’s browser into making dangerous changes to the print-management system.
- Exploitation
- Requires User Interaction
- Attacker needs
- User Interaction
- Complexity
- Moderate
- Impact
- Remote Code Execution
- Component
- Application
- Class
- CSRF
- Remediation
- Upgrade
- Effort
- Medium
- Patch risk
- Low
What it actually does
CVE-2023-2533 is a cross-site request forgery flaw in PaperCut NG/MF administrative functionality. If a PaperCut administrator is already authenticated, an attacker can cause that browser session to submit unauthorized requests to the PaperCut application. Under the vulnerable conditions, those forged requests may alter security-relevant configuration and, in higher-impact scenarios, reach functionality that enables arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the PaperCut application server. The flaw requires user interaction by an authenticated administrator but can be triggered remotely over the network.
Why it matters to the business
Successful exploitation can let an attacker take control of print-management infrastructure, change security settings, disrupt printing operations, access sensitive print-related data, or use the PaperCut server as a foothold for broader internal compromise. The vulnerability is listed in CISA KEV, has active in-the-wild exploitation, and has a CISA remediation due date of 2025-08-18, so organizations running PaperCut NG or MF should treat remediation as urgent even though exploitation depends on an administrator being logged in and tricked into interacting with malicious content.
How an attack unfolds
An attacker first identifies an exposed or reachable PaperCut NG/MF administrative interface and learns or infers actions that can be performed through forged administrative requests. The attacker then prepares a malicious web page, email link, embedded image, form, or script that causes the victim browser to send requests to the PaperCut server. The attacker must induce a PaperCut administrator with an active authenticated session to open the crafted content. Because the browser automatically includes the administrator’s session cookies, the vulnerable PaperCut instance may accept the forged request as if it came from the administrator. Depending on which administrative action is targeted and which product configuration is present, the attacker may change security settings, create or alter administrative functionality, or abuse configuration paths that result in code execution. Afterward, the attacker may validate access, persist through configuration changes or added accounts, and use the PaperCut server to stage additional internal activity.
How to fix it
Upgrade PaperCut NG/MF to a vendor-supported release that includes the fix for CVE-2023-2533. Because no exact fixed versions were provided in the input, verify the correct target version against PaperCut’s official security advisory and release notes before deployment. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to the PaperCut administrative interface to trusted management networks or VPN, block direct internet access, enforce strong administrator session controls, require administrators to use dedicated browsers or hardened workstations for PaperCut administration, and reduce the number of users with PaperCut administrative privileges. Consider adding reverse-proxy or WAF controls that validate Origin and Referer headers for administrative state-changing requests, while treating this only as a temporary mitigation. After patching, review administrator accounts, application configuration, scripts, integrations, and security settings for unauthorized changes.
How to confirm the fix worked
Confirm all PaperCut NG/MF servers report a vendor-supported version containing the CSRF fix. Validate from the application UI, package inventory, and host-level software inventory rather than relying on a single source. Confirm the PaperCut administrative interface is not exposed to untrusted networks and that only approved administrators can reach it. Perform a controlled test in a non-production or approved environment to verify that state-changing administrative requests require valid anti-CSRF protections and are rejected when submitted cross-origin. Review PaperCut administrative audit logs and server logs for unexpected security-setting changes, newly created administrator accounts, configuration changes, or suspicious actions occurring shortly after administrator web browsing or email activity.
Typical attack path
- Reconnaissance: identify an organization using PaperCut NG/MF and determine whether the administrative interface is reachable by the intended victim’s browser.
- Lure preparation: craft a malicious link, HTML page, email, or embedded request that submits an unauthorized administrative action to the PaperCut server.
- Social engineering: trick a currently authenticated PaperCut administrator into opening the malicious content.
- Request forgery: the administrator’s browser sends the forged request with valid PaperCut session cookies.
- Unauthorized change: PaperCut processes the request as an administrator action, potentially changing security settings or enabling execution paths.
- Post-exploitation: attacker confirms the change, gains code execution where possible, modifies configuration, adds access, collects data, or pivots from the PaperCut server.
How to detect it
Look for evidence of unauthorized PaperCut administrative actions rather than a single exploit string, because CSRF exploitation may appear as legitimate requests from a real administrator’s browser. Review PaperCut application server logs, administrative audit logs, web access logs, reverse-proxy logs, WAF logs, endpoint browser history, email security logs, and EDR telemetry from administrator workstations. Focus on state-changing PaperCut admin requests with unexpected external Referer or Origin headers, actions occurring immediately after an administrator opened an email or external web page, configuration changes outside maintenance windows, newly created or modified administrator accounts, disabled or weakened security settings, modified print or server scripts, and suspicious child processes spawned by the PaperCut application service. Because this vulnerability is KEV-listed and reported as actively exploited, correlate PaperCut admin events with network connections from the PaperCut server to unfamiliar destinations and with any post-exploitation activity on the host.
- PaperCut NG
- PaperCut MF
- PaperCut MF Application Server
- PaperCut NG Application Server
- server/logs/server.log
- server/logs/audit.log
- server/logs/admin.log
- /admin
- /app
- Origin: http://
- Referer: http://
What your security team should do
- Patch or upgrade all PaperCut NG/MF instances to a fixed, supported release as the highest priority because the vulnerability is in CISA KEV and exploitation is active in the wild.
- Before patching, restrict PaperCut administrative access to trusted networks, VPN, or privileged access workstations; remove any unnecessary internet exposure.
- Identify all PaperCut administrators and require password rotation and session invalidation after remediation if suspicious activity is found.
- Review PaperCut audit logs, server logs, administrative accounts, security settings, custom scripts, print scripts, and integrations for unauthorized changes.
- Add monitoring for administrative configuration changes and for PaperCut admin requests with unusual Origin or Referer values.
- Educate PaperCut administrators to avoid using the same browser session for email, general web browsing, and PaperCut administration until remediation is complete.
- If compromise is suspected, preserve PaperCut logs and host forensic artifacts before rebuilding or upgrading, then rotate credentials and secrets accessible from the PaperCut server.
The record
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in PaperCut NG/MF, which, under specific conditions, could potentially enable an attacker to alter security settings or execute arbitrary code. This could be exploited if the target is an admin with a current login session. Exploiting this would typically involve the possibility of deceiving an admin into clicking a specially crafted malicious link, potentially leading to unauthorized changes.
Affected packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Introduced | Fixed |
|---|
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-96388 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Tawk.to - Live chat application… CWE-352
- CVE-2026-96374 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Project Browser allows Cross… CWE-352
- CVE-2026-114719 Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a CSRF validation… CWE-352
- CVE-2026-114662 Obot before 0.26.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the CLI login flow… CWE-352
- CVE-2026-111883 Locust through 2.46.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows… CWE-352
- CVE-2026-62139 Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Site Kit by Google <= 1.186.0… CWE-352
- CVE-2026-62133 Subscriber Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in RTMKit <= 2.1.5 versions. CWE-352
- CVE-2026-89245 WWBN AVideo through commit c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1 contains a cross-site… CWE-352